GHK combinations and hair studies
A human hair-count result and a laboratory follicle result come from different preparations. Their exact identities make this corner of the collection interesting.
The combination trial
A 6-month trial in 45 men with androgenetic alopecia tested a complex of 5-aminolevulinic acid and glycyl-histidyl-lysine peptide. Hair counts increased significantly versus placebo. The GHK-containing complex was the intervention studied.
I like the inconvenience of that last sentence. It prevents an appealing human result from being detached from the preparation that produced it. The trial gives a combination a human outcome; deciding how much of the effect came from an individual component would require a different comparison.
The aesthetic interest is clear enough without that extra attribution. A hair count is a measurable feature of an appearance. It still deserves the name of the thing that was actually tested.

The appearance question
The combination trial and the analogue experiment give the appearance question different kinds of material. I have more curiosity about that difference than appetite for declaring a winner between them.
A count in men and a follicle studied outside the body each have a useful place in the room. Neither can silently lend its result to another preparation. The skin studies offer a parallel question about which outcome a flattering percentage actually describes.