Jump to content
Forever Glow Aesthetics

Skin, time, and the work of repair

GHK combinations and hair studies

A human hair-count result and a laboratory follicle result come from different preparations. Their exact identities make this corner of the collection interesting.

The combination trial

A 6-month trial in 45 men with androgenetic alopecia tested a complex of 5-aminolevulinic acid and glycyl-histidyl-lysine peptide. Hair counts increased significantly versus placebo. The GHK-containing complex was the intervention studied.

I like the inconvenience of that last sentence. It prevents an appealing human result from being detached from the preparation that produced it. The trial gives a combination a human outcome; deciding how much of the effect came from an individual component would require a different comparison.

The aesthetic interest is clear enough without that extra attribution. A hair count is a measurable feature of an appearance. It still deserves the name of the thing that was actually tested.

Dark hair fibres on a pale microscope slide beside steel tweezers
Editorial hair-fibre still life, with no growth outcome implied.

The appearance question

The combination trial and the analogue experiment give the appearance question different kinds of material. I have more curiosity about that difference than appetite for declaring a winner between them.

A count in men and a follicle studied outside the body each have a useful place in the room. Neither can silently lend its result to another preparation. The skin studies offer a parallel question about which outcome a flattering percentage actually describes.